Link
Why was such an article stopped? It didn't promote racial disharmony, nor did it have insensitive remarks. And the writer seemed to have done her research, i.e. it is not made up.
Was it a cover up? One can only wonder.
Or was it because the article dealt with a sensitive issue? gays? But, I seem to remember homosexuals being mentioned in the papers last year. Or is it because the article is about how support is given by the government to a group that promotes self hatred (if you're gay).
Or how that the government is "unleashing" a Christian ideals based group onto the supposedly secular schools.
Hooray for Press Freedom in Singapore.
No comments:
Post a Comment